against a construction ERP→
Quandron or a construction ERP
A construction ERP does more and takes longer to put in. When that pays off, and when a firm with engineers on the road is better off with one system that runs from day one.
a construction ERP is strong atEstimating to bill-of-quantities level, valuations and procurement
What you gain with QuandronRunning the same day instead of after an implementation, at a flat rate per business.
See the comparison →
against office software with no field app→
Quandron or office software with no field app
Office software without an app leaves the engineer with a pad. What that costs, and what changes when the job sheet is filled in where the work happens.
office software with no field app is strong atFamiliar, already set up, and cheaper on the licence alone
What you gain with QuandronThe record is made on site, so nothing is typed twice and nothing shrinks on the way to the invoice.
See the comparison →
against several separate subscriptions→
Quandron or four separate subscriptions
A quoting tool, a scheduling app, a forms app and accounting software. Each one good. What it costs to keep them agreeing with each other.
several separate subscriptions is strong atEach tool is better at its own job, and swappable
What you gain with QuandronThe joins are the product: one customer record, and the quote becomes the job becomes the invoice.
See the comparison →
against paper and spreadsheets→
Quandron or paper and spreadsheets
A pad in the van, a wall planner and a spreadsheet. It works until it does not. Where the money actually leaks, and what changes first.
paper and spreadsheets is strong atFree, never goes down, and enough for a sole trader
What you gain with QuandronOne version of the week that the van can see, and invoices that go out the same day.
See the comparison →
against Tradify→
Quandron or Tradify
A flat rate per business against a price per user. What Tradify's plans cost, where the two models part company, and which shape of firm each one suits.
Tradify is strong atThree published plans, and a small bill for a one- or two-person firm
What you gain with QuandronOne rate for the business, so taking somebody on does not change what you pay.
See the comparison →
against Powered Now→
Quandron or Powered Now
Three plans priced per user against one flat rate per business. What Powered Now costs monthly and yearly, and where the two models diverge.
Powered Now is strong atA per-user price is the smaller number up to three people
What you gain with QuandronFrom four people the flat rate comes out lower, and it stays flat.
See the comparison →
against YourTradebase→
Quandron or YourTradebase
A base rate plus a price per extra user against a flat rate per business. Where the two cross, and which shape of firm each one suits.
YourTradebase is strong atThe lowest published starting rate of the five, and a 30-day trial
What you gain with QuandronA rate that stops climbing with every hire, from around eight people.
See the comparison →
against Joblogic→
Quandron or Joblogic
A per-user licence billed annually against a flat monthly rate per business. What Joblogic's published tier costs and where the two models part company.
Joblogic is strong atLarger tiers for bigger teams, priced on enquiry
What you gain with QuandronEvery rate on the page, monthly, with no year to commit to.
See the comparison →
against ServiceM8→
Quandron or ServiceM8
A cap on jobs with unlimited users against a flat rate per business with no cap. What ServiceM8's tiers allow, and which way of counting suits your work.
ServiceM8 is strong atNo per-user pricing at all, and a free tier to start on
What you gain with QuandronA flat rate that counts nothing — no cap on jobs and none on users.
See the comparison →